Having coined the word ‘eugenics’ and inspired leading biologists and statisticians of the early twentieth century, Francis Galton is often studied for his contributions to modern statistical biology. – NOTE 1 * Galton – never the holder of an academic post, briefly trained to be a medical practitioner, championed eugenics in Britain during the last four decades of the nineteenth century. – NOTE 1 *
“Man has gained the mastery of the material world before knowing himself. Thus, modern society has been built at random, according to the chance of scientific discoveries and to the fancy of ideologies, without regard for the laws of our body and soul. We have been the victims of a disastrous illusion—the illusion of our ability to emancipate ourselves from natural laws. We have forgotten that nature never forgives. “ – NOTE 2 *
– link to archive – The Man The Unknown –
” ‘The question of questions’ for we humans, ‘the problem which underlies all others, and is more deeply interesting than any other’ is. T.H. Huxley declared in 1863, ‘the ascertainment of the place which Man occupies in Nature’ and ‘of his relationship to the universe of things.’ ” – NOTE 3 *
https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1rfsrvv.7 – “‘The Question of Questions’: T. H. Huxley, Evolution by Natural Selection and Buddhism.” Dilthey’s Dream: Essays on Human Nature and Culture, by DEREK FREEMAN and James J. Fox, ANU Press, Australia, 2017, pp. 67–86. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1rfsrvv.7. Accessed 22 Aug. 2021.
“The Public Health Service (PHS) Study of Untreated Syphilis in the Male Negro (1932-72) is the most infamous American example of medical research abuse. Commentary on the study has often focused on the reasons for its initiation and for its long duration. Racism, bureaucratic inertia, and the personal motivations of study personnel have been suggested as possible explanations. We develop another explanation by examining the educational and professional linkages shared by three key physicians who launched and directed the study. ” – NOTE 4 *
“[the three researchers] had learned a brand of ‘racial medicine’ that had evolved beyond medical folklore, finding ‘scientific’ validation in eugenic theory. ” – NOTE 4
“[…] all three men were associated with the American eugenics movement […]” – NOTE 4
https://www.jstor.org/stable/44448396 – LOMBARDO, PAUL A., and GREGORY M. DORR. “Eugenics, Medical Education, and the Public Health Service: Another Perspective on the Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment.” Bulletin of the History of Medicine, vol. 80, no. 2, 2006, pp. 291–316. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/44448396. Accessed 22 Aug. 2021.
Dr. David Martin was recently interviewed by Attorney Reiner Fuellmich who is seeking to bring criminal charges against crimes committed during the COVID-19 Plandemic.
The full interview is nearly 90 minutes, and I have received numerous emails from subscribers to Health Impact News alerting us to this interview.
Most of the comments I have seen in reference to this interview have been mentioning that Dr. Martin reveals that there have been patents on the Sars Coronavirus since the late 1990s, which is actually “old news” since he revealed that last year in Mikki Willis’ film, “Plandemic.”
link to https://vaccineimpact.com/2021/dr-david-martin-there-is-no-delta-variant-novel-coronavirus-known-as-covid-19-was-patented-2-decades-ago/
Abstract
Abstract
“The Bayh–Dole Act, which encourages patents on federally funded inventions, has been criticized for forcing consumers to ‘pay twice’ for patented products–first through the tax system and again when the patentee charges a supracompetitive price. Supporters counter that patents promote commercialization, but it is doubtful that this benefit can justify the Act’s present scope. One important feature of Bayh–Dole, however, has been overlooked in this debate–a feature that arises from the global-public-good nature of knowledge. Without patents on US taxpayer-funded inventions, the United States would have no practical way of internalizing the positive externalities these inventions confer on consumers in other countries. Put differently, the charge that Bayh–Dole forces US consumers to `pay twice’ misses the point that eliminating some Bayh–Dole patents would permit non-U.S. consumers to avoid paying at all. To be sure, this `internalization theory’ was not the rationale upon which sponsors of the Act relied. And like commercialization theory, it cannot justify the Act’s present scope. Rather than relying on internalization theory to defend Bayh–Dole, we highlight ways in which this novel theory can inform Bayh–Dole debates.” – NOTE 5 *
link to https://academic.oup.com/jlb/article/4/2/282/3778309 – Daniel J. Hemel, Lisa Larrimore Ouellette, Bayh–Dole beyond borders, Journal of Law and the Biosciences, Volume 4, Issue 2, August 2017, Pages 282–310, https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsx011
About Today’s Featured Image: By Vasily Andreevich Tropinin – link to FEDERAL STATE BUDGETARY INSTITUTION OF CULTURE “ALL-RUSSIAN MUSEUM ASSOCIATION” STATE TRETYAKOV GALLERY “, Public Domain
Notes
1 – https://www.jstor.org/stable/41241682 – RENWICK, CHRIS. “From Political Economy to Sociology: Francis Galton and the Social-Scientific Origins of Eugenics.” The British Journal for the History of Science, vol. 44, no. 3, 2011, pp. 343–369. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/41241682. Accessed 22 Aug. 2021.
2 – link to https://archive DOT org-stream – The Man The Unknown – The Man The Unknown djvu DOT txt – MAN, THE UNKNOWN by ALEXIS CARREL NOBEL PRIZE WINNER Containing A New Introduction To My Friends Frederic R. Coudert Cornelius Clifford and Boris A. Bakhmeteff this book is dedicated Copyright 1935, 1939 by HARPER & BROTHERS All rights reserved
3 – https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1rfsrvv.7 – “‘The Question of Questions’: T. H. Huxley, Evolution by Natural Selection and Buddhism.” Dilthey’s Dream: Essays on Human Nature and Culture, by DEREK FREEMAN and James J. Fox, ANU Press, Australia, 2017, pp. 67–86. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1rfsrvv.7. Accessed 22 Aug. 2021.
4 – https://www.jstor.org/stable/44448396 – LOMBARDO, PAUL A., and GREGORY M. DORR. “Eugenics, Medical Education, and the Public Health Service: Another Perspective on the Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment.” Bulletin of the History of Medicine, vol. 80, no. 2, 2006, pp. 291–316. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/44448396. Accessed 22 Aug. 2021.
5 – Daniel J. Hemel, Lisa Larrimore Ouellette, Bayh–Dole beyond borders, Journal of Law and the Biosciences, Volume 4, Issue 2, August 2017, Pages 282–310, https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsx011
6 – https://www.davidmartin.world/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/The_Fauci_COVID-19_Dossier.pdf – The Fauci/COVID-19 Dossier – This document is prepared for humanity by Dr. Humanity by Dr. David E. Martin
“In rank-order hierarchies, higher levels cannot be said to include lower levers […] nor, as a result, to derive emergent properties from them.” – Allen, Garland E., pg 106
“Mayr (1982: pp 65-66) has identified two types of hierarchies, which he calls constitutive and aggregational. Constitutive hierarchies are arrangements, or groupings, representing levels of organization within a system – for example, the hierarchical arrangement which starts with cells and goes into tissues, systems, organisms and finally populations.” – Allen, Garland E., pg 105
“The properties of higher levels are thus emergent with respect to the lower levels’ properties out of which they are constituted.” – Allen, Garland E., pg 105
“Aggregational hierarchies […] are arrangements made purely for convenience. [i.e. taxonomic] – “[These higher levels] are not emergent from processes or interactions at lower levels.” – Allen, Garland E., pg 105
https://www.jstor.org/stable/23328344 – link – link to Allen, Garland E. “THE MISUSE OF BIOLOGICAL HIERARCHIES: THE AMERICAN EUGENICS MOVEMENT, 1900-1940.” History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, vol. 5, no. 2, 1983, pp. 105–128. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/23328344. Accessed 22 Aug. 2021.
Sources
https://www.jstor.org/stable/4208132 – Leatherbarrow, W. J. “Idealism and Utopian Socialism in Dostoyevsky’s Gospodin Prokharchin and Slaboye Serdtse.” The Slavonic and East European Review, vol. 58, no. 4, 1980, pp. 524–540. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/4208132. Accessed 22 Aug. 2021.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/44306807 – Cleves, Rachel Hope, et al. “Interchange: The War of 1812.” The Journal of American History, vol. 99, no. 2, 2012, pp. 520–555. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/44306807. Accessed 22 Aug. 2021.
BURKE, CHLOE S., and CHRISTOPHER J. CASTANEDA. “The Public and Private History of Eugenics: An Introduction.” The Public Historian, vol. 29, no. 3, 2007, pp. 5–17. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/tph.2007.29.3.5. Accessed 22 Aug. 2021. – https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/tph.2007.29.3.5 – link
link to Allen, Garland E. “THE MISUSE OF BIOLOGICAL HIERARCHIES: THE AMERICAN EUGENICS MOVEMENT, 1900-1940.” History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, vol. 5, no. 2, 1983, pp. 105–128. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/23328344. Accessed 22 Aug. 2021.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/1884524 – Field, James A. “The Progress of Eugenics.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 26, no. 1, 1911, pp. 1–67. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/1884524. Accessed 22 Aug. 2021. – The Progress of Eugenics – James A. Field
link to Bayh–Dole Act – en DOT wikipedia DOT org wiki Bayh–Dole Act – link to academic DOT oup.com jlb article 4/2/282/3778309 – Bayh–Dole beyond borders
The Quarterly Journal of Economics
Nov. 1911
The Progress of Eugenics
I. The Beginnings of Eugenics. Plato, 2.–The Origin of Species and its influence, 3.–Galton and the modern eugenics movement, 4.–Hereditary Genius, 6.–Greg, 8.–Darwin, 10.–de Candolle, 12.–Galton’s English Men of Science, 13.–Inquiries into Human Faculty, 15.–Natural Inheritance, 16.–The revival of eugenics. Karl Pearson, 17.–Galton’s later writings, 19.–Eugenics: Its Definition, Scope, and Aims, 20.–II. Eugenic Investigations. Heredity, 24.–Pearson’s biometric studies, 25.–The Francis Galton Laboratory for National Eugenics, 26.–The Eugenics Laboratory publications, 27.–The relative influence of heredity and environment, 29.–Criticism of the biometric method, 31.–Biometry v. Mendelism, 31.–Mendelian methods in eugenics, 33.–Early eugenic ideas in America, 33.–The American Breeders’ Association, 35.–The Eugenics Record Office and its work, 36.–III. The Eugenic Program. The popularization of eugenics, 39.–The Eugenics Education Society, 39.–International organizations, 39.–Applied eugenics: Constructive v. restrictive methods, 41.–Attempts to restrict the increase of undesirables, 45.–IV. Recent eugenic literature. Saleeby’s Parenthood and Race Culture, 47.–Whethams’ The Family and the Nation, 48.–Kellicott’s The Social Direction of Human Evolution, 51.–Davenport’s Race Improvement through Eugenics, 53.–Eugenics in Europe, 57.–Rassenbiologie, 58.–The “Natur und Staat” series, 59.–V. The Rationale of Eugenics. The lack of an adequate social philosophy in prevalent eugenic opinion, 61.–Eugenics in relation to natural selection, 62.–Exceptional ability v. general betterment, 63.–The outlook for eugenics, 66.This is the content viewer section. Skip to metadata section.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/41241682 – RENWICK, CHRIS. “From Political Economy to Sociology: Francis Galton and the Social-Scientific Origins of Eugenics.” The British Journal for the History of Science, vol. 44, no. 3, 2011, pp. 343–369. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/41241682. Accessed 22 Aug. 2021.
“Having coined the word ‘eugenics’ and inspired leading biologists and statisticians of the early twentieth century, Francis Galton is often studied for his contributions to modern statistical biology. However, whilst documenting this part of his work, historians have frequently neglected crucial aspects of what motivated Galton to establish his eugenics research program. Arguing that his work was shaped more by social than by biological science, this paper addresses these oversights by tracing the development of Galton’s program from its roots in a debate about political economy to his appeals for it to be taken up by sociologists. In so doing, the paper not only returns Galton’s ideas to their original context but also provides a reason to reflect on the place of the social sciences in history-of-science scholarship.” – Abstract
“[…] far from being a distraction, social-science debates played a major role in shaping the identity of Galton’s research programme.” – pg. 344
https://www.jstor.org/stable/41241682 – RENWICK, CHRIS. “From Political Economy to Sociology: Francis Galton and the Social-Scientific Origins of Eugenics.” The British Journal for the History of Science, vol. 44, no. 3, 2011, pp. 343–369. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/41241682. Accessed 22 Aug. 2021.
link to THE ILLUSION OF KNOWLEDGE – LECTURE BY DR. DAVID MARTIN
link to https://eugenics.us/thomas-huxley – ACCESSED 8-22-2021 – Editorial from a 1911 edition of Scientific American [Source]: Sci-Am’s Editor’s note: This editorial was written and published in 1911. Although our editors of a century ago pondered some lofty aspirations for the orderly future of humans, it was only three decades later that the brutal reality of a Nazi social order suffused with a eugenicist ideal brought home the practical shortcomings of the philosophy.
link to https://archive DOT org-stream – The Man The Unknown – The Man The Unknown djvu DOT txt – MAN, THE UNKNOWN by ALEXIS CARREL NOBEL PRIZE WINNER Containing A New Introduction To My Friends Frederic R. Coudert Cornelius Clifford and Boris A. Bakhmeteff this book is dedicated Copyright 1935, 1939 by HARPER & BROTHERS All rights reserved
https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1gxpbw0.13 – Wallace, Jeff. “T. H. HUXLEY, SCIENCE AND CULTURAL AGENCY.” Darwin, Tennyson and Their Readers: Explorations in Victorian Literature and Science, edited by Valerie Purton, Anthem Press, LONDON; NEW YORK; DELHI, 2013, pp. 153–166. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1gxpbw0.13. Accessed 22 Aug. 2021.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1rfsrvv.7 – “‘The Question of Questions’: T. H. Huxley, Evolution by Natural Selection and Buddhism.” Dilthey’s Dream: Essays on Human Nature and Culture, by DEREK FREEMAN and James J. Fox, ANU Press, Australia, 2017, pp. 67–86. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1rfsrvv.7. Accessed 22 Aug. 2021.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/44448396 – LOMBARDO, PAUL A., and GREGORY M. DORR. “Eugenics, Medical Education, and the Public Health Service: Another Perspective on the Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment.” Bulletin of the History of Medicine, vol. 80, no. 2, 2006, pp. 291–316. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/44448396. Accessed 22 Aug. 2021.
The Public Health Service (PHS) Study of Untreated Syphilis in the Male Negro (1932-72) is the most infamous American example of medical research abuse. Commentary on the study has often focused on the reasons for its initiation and for its long duration. Racism, bureaucratic inertia, and the personal motivations of study personnel have been suggested as possible explanations. We develop another explanation by examining the educational and professional linkages shared by three key physicians who launched and directed the study. PHS surgeon general Hugh Cumming initiated Tuskegee, and assistant surgeons general Taliaferro Clark and Raymond A. Vonderlehr presided over the study during its first decade. All three had graduated from the medical school at the University of Virginia, a center of eugenics teaching, where students were trained to think about race as a key factor in both the etiology and the natural history of syphilis. Along with other senior officers in the PHS, they were publicly aligned with the eugenics movement. Tuskegee provided a vehicle for testing a eugenic hypothesis: that racial groups were differentially susceptible to infectious diseases.
link to https://vaccineimpact.com/2021/dr-david-martin-there-is-no-delta-variant-novel-coronavirus-known-as-covid-19-was-patented-2-decades-ago/
link to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayh%E2%80%93Dole_Act
https://www.jstor.org/stable/23546505 – MIHM, STEPHEN. “The Alchemy of the Self: Stephen Burroughs and the Counterfeit Economy of the Early Republic.” Early American Studies, vol. 2, no. 1, 2004, pp. 123–159. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/23546505. Accessed 22 Aug. 2021.
https://www.davidmartin.world/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/The_Fauci_COVID-19_Dossier.pdf
https://www.jstor.org/stable/26660830 – Dudzinski, David M. “Reflections on Historical, Scientific, and Legal Issues Relevant to Designing Approval Pathways for Generic Versions of Recombinant Protein-Based Therapeutics and Monoclonal Antibodies.” Food and Drug Law Journal, vol. 60, no. 2, 2005, pp. 143–260. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/26660830. Accessed 22 Aug. 2021.
Links of Vital Importance
link to THE SILENT WAR EP. 6086: TALIBAN BLANK VISAS TO USA BASES, JAN 6TH BIG LIE, TREASON & VAX FAILS
link to THERE IS NO VARIANT, NOT NOVEL, NO PANDEMIC: DR DAVID MARTIN WITH REINER FUELLMICH.
link to rights freedoms DOT wordpress DOT com – 2021/06/15 – sars cov 2 vaccines and neurodegenerative disease
link to the epoch times DOT com – live: texans rally for vaccine choice 3959047 DOT html
